Skip to main content

Chinese Government Card Swipe Crackdown Hits Macau

By February 28, 2020Royal Vegas Casino

Chinese Government Card Swipe Crackdown Hits Macau

Gambling funds obtained through illicit card-swiping in Macau are estimated to 12 percent of mass market turnover. (Image: Brain)

The effect of China’s imminent crackdown on the use of hand-held card swipers is being felt in Macau, with the Wynn Macau witnessing its biggest market decline since October 2011.

Macau’s casino economy has soared over the last couple of years, so much so that it now eclipses vegas since the gambling money of the world, however the Chinese government’s sudden enforcement of a ban on unlawful money transfers has investors worried; Wynn Resorts Ltd. fell recently to 8.5 percent at the close in Hong Kong trading, while MGM China Holdings Ltd. dropped 8.2 per cent for the same period. The Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd., meanwhile, fell 7.6 percent, while Sands Asia Ltd. dropped 4.6 percent, and SJM Holdings Ltd., 6.6 per cent.

People to Macau from the mainland are permitted to bring only 20,000 yuan ($3,200) into the gambling hub and could only withdraw 10,000 yuan per time, per card, from money devices. To swerve the restrictions, tourists have the ability to purchase goods from local pawn shops utilizing their debit cards then trade them for regional currency with the same pawnbroker.

Illegal Card-Swiping Amounts to $6 Billion

However, the use that is increasing of machines in casinos has perhaps not only caused a slump in Macau’s pawnbroking industry, but it is additionally got the Chinese authorities jittery about tens of billions of yuan in illegal funds which are being taken out of the mainland and into Macau.

According to Karen Tang, an analyst at Deutsche Bank AG in Hong Kong, funds obtained through illicit card-swiping in Macau are estimated to amount to $6 billion per that’s about 12 percent of mass market turnover year.

Macau authorities made 12 arrests pay that is involving fraud situations in February and March of this season. Six people were arrested on 18th, with UnionPay card terminals, account books and HK$700,000 of cash seized february. Then, on March 6th, police said they’d arrested four more and more people, with three China UnionPay card terminals, purchase receipts and HK$920,000 confiscated; two people had been arrested eight times later and police found four re payment terminal devices, 304 bank cards, verification devices, card usage receipts, Chinese travel licenses and much more than HK$3.4 million ($438,000) in cash.

While Asia announced it will be imposing restrictions in the utilization of state-backed debit card company UnionPay, the business itself told press it works closely with the authorities to combat all types of illegal bank card use.

Visa Restrictions

Meanwhile, the China that is state-owned Central station reported Macau might also face a tightening of control of its visa applications. Macau visitors who don’t travel on up to a country that is third-party be given a stamp on their passport, which would jeopardize future visa applications.

The growth in Macau in recent years has been in component as a result of the expansion of Chinese tourism, which has in turn been fueled by the emergence of a relaxation by the Chinese federal government on the restriction of movement for its citizens. These restrictions that are new be another source of anxiety for Macau’s investors.

However, Union Gaming analyst Grant Govertsen urged investors not to panic, saying, ‘Judging from past experience, it’s often all bark with no bite. The shortening of a visitor’s stay or the stricter use of cash cards won’t curb the gamblers necessarily’ capacity to gamble.’

Illinois Lawmaker Makes Final Stand for Gambling Expansion

Democratic Illinois Representative Bob Rita is frustrated at absence of passion for his Illinois gambling bill, but still believes it could be passed. (Image: AP/Seth Perlman)

The clock could be ticking and the odds may be against him, but Democratic Representative Bob Rita, the main sponsor of a bill to expand gambling within the state of Illinois, is building a last-ditch make an effort to gather support for the legislation he thinks will help plug a $1.8 billion hole in state coffers.

This week while Illinois debates whether to extend the current temporary income tax in order to deal with the deficit, Rita expressed his frustration at a lack of urgency from the state’s politicians in a letter to House Speaker Michael Madigan and royal vegas casino canada Republican leader Jim Durkin.

‘The reception to these amendments has been underwhelming,’ complained Rita, who added that he does not understand just why a bill that passed out of the chamber that is upper to be lacking any support.

Down to the Wire

The legislation, scheduled to be heard in a residence committee Monday, had not been required a vote, but there’s still a slim chance that the bill could be changed or redrafted, and then passed by the Legislature before the May 31 deadline, and Rita is desperate to rally the troops.

Bill SB1849 proposes two options: a) the creation of five casinos that are new including one in Chicago, too as new slots and horseracing tracks; or b) the building of the Vegas-style ‘mega casino’ in Chicago.

$1 Billion a for state and city year

‘The Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce testified last month that a Chicago casino alone could generate almost $1 billion per year in income for the state and city, and that a 10,000-position casino as I allowed for in one amendment may not be enough to meet up the consumer demand,’ said Rita.

The tax that is temporary runs down in January also it’s perhaps not understood whether Democrats will garner sufficient votes to secure an extension. ‘Clearly, we are planning to require revenue,’ reasoned Rita in his page.

It is clear that Bob Rita has his work cut away for him. Similar gambling plans have already been passed by the legislature before, only to be vetoed at the last hurdle by Governor Pat Quinn. Quinn has yet to express he clearly has hang-ups about Chicago’s checkered history of mobsters and corruption his two predecessors are in prison for the latter and the idea of casino expansion makes him jittery whether he would approve the measure, but. He vetoed an expansion bill in 2012 on the grounds it lacked ethical criteria and would attract ‘unsavory influences.’

No ‘Loopholes for Mobsters’

‘We’re not gonna have loopholes for mobsters in Illinois,’ Quinn said at the time. ‘The bill which was on my desk was woefully lacking when it came to protecting integrity and honesty and regulation of gambling in our state.’

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, meanwhile, has said he wants to resolve the $100 million pension crisis before considering gambling expansion.

Casino gaming found Illinois in 1990 because of the passage through of the Riverboat Gambling Act, partly in response to Iowa’s decision to legalize riverboat gaming along the Mississippi River. At first the boats had been needed to cruise until a statutory law was passed in 1999 allowing them to moor forever. Ten licenses were granted initially, with the proviso that no casino would be permitted within Cook County, in order to preserve Chicago’s famous horseracing tracks, which are opposed to Rita’s efforts to expand casino gambling in hawaii.

New Lucky Streaks Research Actively Seeks Exactly What Makes Winners

Gamblers on winning streaks might seem to win more often, but research says that’s only because they’re making safer bets. (Image:

Anyone who has ever stepped foot in the casino or just produced few friendly wagers with friends has probably run across a streak of incredible good or luck that is bad minimum when. It’s that evening where you can’t lose at roulette even if you try, or the one where every coin flip goes against you at the poker table.

For some gamblers, superstition and luck play major roles in their casino routines. Others point away that believing one can predict such good and bad streaks is just a form of the gambling fallacy, and that there is no way to know whether random results are going to turn in your favor. But a new study suggests this is not exactly real, thanks to the practices for the gamblers on their own.

Winners Keep Winning, Losers More Likely to Lose Once Again

According up to a study that is new University College London psychology professor Nigel Harvey and graduate student Juemin Xu, as it happens that winning players do tend to keep winning, while losers are more inclined to continue their losing streaks. The study, posted in the May 2014 issue of Cognition, looked over online gamblers at a sports site that is betting come to these conclusions.

Don’t worry: the study didn’t just rewrite the legislation of likelihood. Instead, it ends up that gamblers tend to engage in behavior that improves chances that they can carry on winning (or losing) more regularly than one might expect.

The study looked at over 565,000 wagers made by 776 bettors. On the initial bet any customer made, their likelihood of winning was just 48 percent. A follow-up to that particular winner would win at a 49 percent price a tremendously small increase that hardly seems significant. But from then on, chances went through the roof. A third bet would win 57 percent of the time after two wins. If the streak kept going, the following bets would win 67 percent associated with time, then 72 per cent, and finally 75 % of times for the sixth bet in a winning streak. Meanwhile, losing players saw their chances plunge as time proceeded. After a loss, gamblers would only get back to win 47 percent of the time. That number dropped to 45 percent, and kept going down all the way to an astounding 23 percent after six losings after two losses.

Betting Behavior Makes Up Change

The numbers are difficult to argue with. However, if streaks aren’t predictable, exactly what could be causing this? The researchers first seemed to see in the event that players utilizing the winning streaks were merely better at wagering than those who had runs that are bad. However in the end, both groups lost almost exactly the same sum of money per lb they bet. Instead, it ends up that the response was in the types of bets the gamblers had been making. Players on winning streaks increasingly switched to safer bets in order to keep their streaks alive.

Meanwhile, losers were trying riskier and riskier wagers either to chase their losings, or simply because they felt their fortune had to change soon. That behavior ended up being perhaps inspired by the gambler’s fallacy: the idea that results need to ‘balance’ a person’s luck. However, it really served to increase the likelihood that the streaks would continue.

Essentially, the ‘hot hand’ fallacy (the belief that hot streaks will carry on, or the alternative of this gambler’s fallacy) was found to be true, but just because players were actively helping their streaks to last longer than they would when they made similar bets irrespective of their recent results. It’s maybe not new mathematics it’s merely another method by which human behavior can cause some unforeseen results.