Skip to main content

DraftKings Logo Boils Down at World Series of Poker Before Live November Nine Broadcast

By February 26, 2020Royal Vegas Casino

DraftKi<span id="more-2606"></span>ngs Logo Boils Down at World Series of Poker Before Live November Nine Broadcast

This DraftKings logo design will not be used by November Niner Max Steinberg when WSOP returns to the Rio for the airing of the final dining table on ESPN. The daily fantasy recreations operator cut relations using the World Series of Poker, and asked that its logo be removed from the broadcast.

DraftKings, which during last summer’s World Series of Poker (WSOP) seemed become reigning high and proud, will not be seen regarding the upcoming table that is final on ESPN.

WSOP will secure all eyes of the poker world November that is beginning 8 due to the fact November Nine commences survive ESPN. The Rio will welcome back the Main Event’s nine finalists for a prize of $7,680,021 waiting for the winner. But DraftKings would be a no-show.

The honor and achievement of going to the November Nine is a life-altering experience, but DraftKings has respectfully expected the WSOP to remove its signage and branding from the event and end its sponsorship contract immediately.

The daily fantasy sports (DFS) operator is embroiled in a legal and public opinion struggle throughout the last thirty days as its contests have come under fire and even FBI scrutiny.

Speaking on behalf of the WSOP and its parent business Caesars, Vice President of Corporate Communications for Caesars Interactive Entertainment Seth Palansky said DraftKings ‘asked us to stop any sponsorship activities … and we complied.’

What’s Complete is performed

Pre-taped protection of the Main Event in July is airing since September 14 on ESPN. As of the DraftKings’ presence is still heavily felt, its logos surrounding the room and strategically placed on the, well, felt week.

Though Caesars will strip the posters and ads for the three times of November broadcasts, little can likely be done for what’s already been shot.

DFS operators are tactically trying to distance themselves from poker and gambling as politicians, attorneys, and media pundits deliberate on whether or not the contests that are weekly gambling or are skill-based activities. DraftKings and competing FanDuel argue it’s the latter.

That wasn’t always the case, with DraftKings CEO Jason Robins once explaining his platform as a mashup between traditional fantasy leagues and poker.

Exactly What About Max?

November Niner Max Steinberg will be seated at the final table. The 27-year-old turned $27 on DraftKings into a $10,000 Main Event entry via a satellite contest.

The win that is big the daily dream platform required Steinberg to sport the DraftKings logo on his attire, which they can be seen wearing on ESPN during his ascent up the leaderboard. But come next month, Steinberg won’t be showing the DFS emblem.

DraftKings cut ties with the WSOP, and evidently also with Steinberg. ‘I am no more affiliated with DraftKings,’ Steinberg tweeted on 21 october.

Steinberg heads into the November Nine in the center of the pack in 5th with 20.2 million chips.

The folding of DraftKings in the World number of Poker has produced more conversation on poker’s marquee event compared to the tournament that is actual. That might be as a result of Joe McKeehen’s commanding stack that is big, his 63.1 million chips accounting for 32.8 percent of this total in play.

Many poker fans and sports enthusiasts in general have had sufficient of hearing about daily dream activities.

The onslaught of television commercials from DraftKings and FanDuel over the year that is last and now the subsequent coverage of this day-to-day dream legal discourse has led to a rather negative public viewpoint among outsiders.

94-year-young William Wachter might best have said it during in 2010’s Main Event. When asked what he desired to say to all the players at the Rio, Wachter responded, ‘Shut up and deal.’

Studio City Macau Opens with Hollywood A-Listers in Attendance

Mariah Carey and James Packer celebrate the grand opening of Studio City Macau. Carey is rumored to were paid $1 million for her set. (Image:

Studio City, Macau, James Packer’s new $4.5 billion integrated casino resort regarding the Cotai Strip, finally flung open its doors on Tuesday evening having a little help from the billionaire casino mogul’s latest squeeze, Mariah Carey.

Carey is rumored to have been paid $1 million for belting out her back catalogue as the wants of Robert De Nero and Leonardo DiCaprio mingled among the audience regarding the opening night.

Not only is the television and movie-themed Studio City the casino that is only mingle television and film production facilities utilizing the old-fashioned shopping, gaming and hotel attractions, but it is also the only turn to come featuring its own Scorsese-directed brief movie, starring the aforementioned and Brad Pitt.

The night marked the premier of the movie that is 15-minute entitled The Audition, for that the movie stars had been rumored to have pocketed around $10 million each.

‘It’s the coolest 15 minutes ever made,’ Packer assured a press meeting early in the day.

Burst Bubble

For all the glitz, Studio City was conceived in a very different financial environment through the one Macau knows today, an occasion of unprecedented growth when investors will need to have felt that the bubble could not burst.

2 yrs ago Forbes declared Macau to be one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. Its casinos were taking every two months exactly what Vegas was consuming a year.

But Chinese President Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption drive has halted the success story and delivered profits tumbling for 16 straight months.

‘ I don’t think some of the operators might have predicted what has occurred now,’ Packer told CNBC recently. ‘As an investor that is australian China and Macau, it’s very hard to be critical of a corruption crackdown… [but] when and how that ends is something that no body knows.’

Studio City was conceived by US investment firms Silver aim Capital LP and Oaktree Capital Management LLC and Hong Kong’s eSun Holdings Ltd, but bitter legal wrangles between the various investors delayed its construction.

Packer and Lawrence Ho’s Melco Crown stepped in 2011, gaining a controlling 60 percent stake within the construction and property work resumed.

Packer Upbeat

Melco Crown had hoped to get the blessing regarding the Macau government for 400 video gaming tables in the casino floor, that will be the amount it says it needs to make the venture rewarding, however it had been announced week that is last the company would receive just 250.

Macau has been sparring with its table allocations in present months, bowing to pressure from Beijing, which wants the gambling hub to concentrate on producing more non-gambling associated amenities.

Despite the setback Packer remains positive concerning the long-term future of Macau: ‘The long-term picture that is macro Macau continues to be incredibly exciting,’ he said. ‘I think we’ve all got to keep in mind the truth that this has been a ride that is terrific far, and nothing is a straight line up.’

William Hill Voice Activated Betting App Cleared by Aussie Police

Tom Waterhouse, William Hill’s Australian chief, insists that the company’s software, which exploits a loophole Australia’s gaming legislation, is entirely legal. (Image: Daniel Pleming)

William Hill Australia as well as other licensed operators have actually gained a victory that is important their battle to offer in-play mobile betting to Australian clients.

The Australian Federal Police (APF) told William Hill this week that it might not be launching an research in to the legality regarding the company’s controversial ‘Click to Call’ betting app.

Top metal at William Hill have always asserted that the Simply Click to Call service is completely legal, but in August the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) begged to differ, accusing the bookmaker of exploiting a grey legal loophole.

Not able to launch unique investigation that is criminal it referred William Hill, as well as Bet365, Ladbrokes, as well as other operators whose apps mirror the service, towards the police accusing them of being in breach for the nation’s gambling laws.

‘Great Outcome for Aussie Punters’

Australia’s Interactive Gambling Act 2011 stipulates that in-game bets must be placed in-person or by phone.

Simply Click to Call and its particular imitators neatly skirt the matter by making use of voice recognition technology which allows bettors to confirm their wagers using a voice command that is simple.

The feature has been around operation since and was quickly followed into the market by copycat apps from other operators april. Ladbrokes suspended its variation after complaints from the news regulator, but will be emboldened to resume the service.

‘William Hill has received confirmation that is formal the Australian Federal Police will not be investigating the complaints called to it by the Australian Communication and Media Authority regarding its ‘In-Play’ product that allows customers to bet live within a game with just several taps,’ said Tom Waterhouse, William Hill’s Australian chief.

‘ This will be a outcome that is great Australian punters who will no further have to bet in-play via unlawful offshore bookmakers which pose a huge threat to both consumer security and the integrity of Australian sport.’

Review Underway

The situation has now been passed back again to the ACMA, which told Fairfax Media it remains concerned about the continuation of the service.

‘Notwithstanding the AFP’s choice, the ACMA remains worried about the potentially prohibited gambling that is internet complained of and may refer future complaints about comparable Australian hosted content to the AFP,’ it said.

Overview of the Interactive Gaming Act is underway in Australia as lawmakers seek to figure out whether its statutes have failed to keep up with the fast-paced alterations in the way in which customers interact with recreations operators vegas royal casino support that are betting.

Under scrutiny could be the detrimental economic impact of unlicensed, overseas internet sites, lots of whom offer in-play betting to Australian customers with impunity, as lawmakers attempt to estimate the real scale of the situation.